Who is the worst character on AIO?
*mutters* Disgraceful...positively disgraceful.
Awwww...that warms my heart...thanks Pound Foolish, you're one my favorites too!
Awwww...that warms my heart...thanks Pound Foolish, you're one my favorites too!
“It is one of the defects of my character that I cannot altogether dislike anyone who makes me laugh.”
Emily Rules!
Emily Rules!
- Samantha14
- Mint Chocolate Chip
- Posts: 2082
- Joined: November 2012
- Location: Neverland, usually hanging out with Peter Pan.
I honestly don't understand how anyone could truly hate a character. It's just wrong.
Characters who have poor features or need work on their dimension, design, etc. I can understand. But, we don't hate them for it. We dream that they get the attention from the writers, or actors/actresses that they need, but we don't just give up on them.
That would be what we call fair weather fandom. When they meet up to our personal expectations, or our own selfish wants, THEN we appreciate their character. But, if there's a single quirk that doesn't fit in our desires, then said character is suddenly the worst character on the planet.
But, that's not what we're supposed to do, and we all know it. Just like people, we can't change everyone to be our own perfect little angels. We have to love them for who they are. the good, the bad, and the squeaky voiced.
I've heard a lot being said for characters such as Emily Jones and Sarah Pratchett. For Emily, they whine and complain about her "squeaky voice" or her "Know it all attitude" (Which, while I find her highly intelligent, I don't see anything that has to do with "know it all-ness".) For Sarah, they complain that she's a brat and is rude and hateful to anyone she meets. (Which is not true. We see this in her friendship with both Mandy and Liz.)
Question: What would it be like if they changed? I don't understand why you would want such incredible characters such as these, and more, to change to fit your tastes. Did you ever think characters that are meant to stink, or characters that act a certain way, are that way for a reason?
Think about it. Filler characters such as a monotone teacher are meant to sound dull and off, because that's what just fits within the story line. Bully characters are meant to be jerks BECAUSE they are just that: BULLIES. Sarah is the sarcastic little snot, because that's what she's SUPPOSED to be. We can't hate characters for what they are. We have to look deeper. We hate their attitudes, their roles, their overall character... And that's why we love them.
Again, I ask, what would it be like if they changed? Where would we be if Sarah suddenly turned into a Sensitive, Soft Spoken, Shadow, instead of her Tough, Witty, Spotlight? Certainly not laughing at unforgettable lines such as:
Sarah Pratchett: You're a sad little boy.
Jared DeWhite: And you're just as ignorant as the rest of the youth of America.
Or
Mandy Straussberg: That's not a crazy person, that's Jared!
Sarah Pratchett: Do you realize what you just said?
Or
Sarah Pratchett: What if I see someone, say, Jared, breaking a rule. Can I punch him in the stomach?
Connie Kendall: NO!
And what would happen if our very own Emily Jones went from our Lean, Green, Mystery Solving Machine to a Pink... Okay, I have no rhyme for this one. But you get the point. If she went from solving to shopping, how would we follow along, laughing and cracking cases such as "The Malted Milkball Falcon"? How could we fall in love with the cute crush story in the "Green Ring Conspiracy", or feel the pain of a mistaken identity in "Emily the Genius", if Emily weren't herself? At least, the self we all know and should love.
How could we love the zany antics of a confused Jay Smouse, feeling his hurt in "Mistaken for Good", or feeling a since of pride during "Groundhog Jay" when he decides to make things right, if he were a goody two shoes?
What about if Matthew Parker wasn't a tinkerer? If Valerie wasn't a stuck up valley girl? If Nelson wasn't a paranoid nerd?
Fact being: We couldn't. We can complain about each ill-quirk each character has. But another fact: Said characters wouldn't be said characters without their quirks, or good things, or bad things... You name it! Their quirks and such are what make them them! Unique and lovable. Each and all.
Sure, some characters need work. I'll be the first to admit it. Would something more than a awkward giggly jerk between Barrett and Priscilla be a bad thing? Of course not. If each character had more to them than just to have the same "Crush story" (Which even then isn't much of a story right now..) over and over, then imagine the possibilities!
If we could explore the "worlds" of each character, giving each an in-depth story and true meaning for existence, like Connie and Eugene, Mr. Whittaker, Jason, Katrina... It would all just work perfectly. But, we don't exactly have that right now. I know that. But, until then, we have to learn how to be content with what we have, and just hope we get "a little more" in the near future.
Everything has a reason, even if we can't see it. Does that mean we have to just adore EVERY character in the entire series? Of course not. But we don't have to label them the worst characters in AIO either. Do some need work? Yes. Are there some characters we like over others? Of course! (Emily rules! *Cough* )
However, I do not see one character that does not fit perfectly, in their own creative and unique way, in this wonderful world we know as Odyssey. It's beautiful. Always.
Okay, I'm done rambling now. *Gets off soap box*
Characters who have poor features or need work on their dimension, design, etc. I can understand. But, we don't hate them for it. We dream that they get the attention from the writers, or actors/actresses that they need, but we don't just give up on them.
That would be what we call fair weather fandom. When they meet up to our personal expectations, or our own selfish wants, THEN we appreciate their character. But, if there's a single quirk that doesn't fit in our desires, then said character is suddenly the worst character on the planet.
But, that's not what we're supposed to do, and we all know it. Just like people, we can't change everyone to be our own perfect little angels. We have to love them for who they are. the good, the bad, and the squeaky voiced.

I've heard a lot being said for characters such as Emily Jones and Sarah Pratchett. For Emily, they whine and complain about her "squeaky voice" or her "Know it all attitude" (Which, while I find her highly intelligent, I don't see anything that has to do with "know it all-ness".) For Sarah, they complain that she's a brat and is rude and hateful to anyone she meets. (Which is not true. We see this in her friendship with both Mandy and Liz.)
Question: What would it be like if they changed? I don't understand why you would want such incredible characters such as these, and more, to change to fit your tastes. Did you ever think characters that are meant to stink, or characters that act a certain way, are that way for a reason?
Think about it. Filler characters such as a monotone teacher are meant to sound dull and off, because that's what just fits within the story line. Bully characters are meant to be jerks BECAUSE they are just that: BULLIES. Sarah is the sarcastic little snot, because that's what she's SUPPOSED to be. We can't hate characters for what they are. We have to look deeper. We hate their attitudes, their roles, their overall character... And that's why we love them.
Again, I ask, what would it be like if they changed? Where would we be if Sarah suddenly turned into a Sensitive, Soft Spoken, Shadow, instead of her Tough, Witty, Spotlight? Certainly not laughing at unforgettable lines such as:
Sarah Pratchett: You're a sad little boy.
Jared DeWhite: And you're just as ignorant as the rest of the youth of America.
Or
Mandy Straussberg: That's not a crazy person, that's Jared!
Sarah Pratchett: Do you realize what you just said?
Or
Sarah Pratchett: What if I see someone, say, Jared, breaking a rule. Can I punch him in the stomach?
Connie Kendall: NO!
And what would happen if our very own Emily Jones went from our Lean, Green, Mystery Solving Machine to a Pink... Okay, I have no rhyme for this one. But you get the point. If she went from solving to shopping, how would we follow along, laughing and cracking cases such as "The Malted Milkball Falcon"? How could we fall in love with the cute crush story in the "Green Ring Conspiracy", or feel the pain of a mistaken identity in "Emily the Genius", if Emily weren't herself? At least, the self we all know and should love.
How could we love the zany antics of a confused Jay Smouse, feeling his hurt in "Mistaken for Good", or feeling a since of pride during "Groundhog Jay" when he decides to make things right, if he were a goody two shoes?
What about if Matthew Parker wasn't a tinkerer? If Valerie wasn't a stuck up valley girl? If Nelson wasn't a paranoid nerd?
Fact being: We couldn't. We can complain about each ill-quirk each character has. But another fact: Said characters wouldn't be said characters without their quirks, or good things, or bad things... You name it! Their quirks and such are what make them them! Unique and lovable. Each and all.
Sure, some characters need work. I'll be the first to admit it. Would something more than a awkward giggly jerk between Barrett and Priscilla be a bad thing? Of course not. If each character had more to them than just to have the same "Crush story" (Which even then isn't much of a story right now..) over and over, then imagine the possibilities!
If we could explore the "worlds" of each character, giving each an in-depth story and true meaning for existence, like Connie and Eugene, Mr. Whittaker, Jason, Katrina... It would all just work perfectly. But, we don't exactly have that right now. I know that. But, until then, we have to learn how to be content with what we have, and just hope we get "a little more" in the near future.
Everything has a reason, even if we can't see it. Does that mean we have to just adore EVERY character in the entire series? Of course not. But we don't have to label them the worst characters in AIO either. Do some need work? Yes. Are there some characters we like over others? Of course! (Emily rules! *Cough* )
However, I do not see one character that does not fit perfectly, in their own creative and unique way, in this wonderful world we know as Odyssey. It's beautiful. Always.
Okay, I'm done rambling now. *Gets off soap box*

- godisawesomeness99
- Raspberry Ripple
- Posts: 566
- Joined: November 2012
- Location: Seattle
well said sam, I agree. I don't hate any characters as well
here from time to time....
Psalm 73:24
Psalm 73:24
Me neither. 

I'm the leader of the KRE, the group dedicated to countering ERK the Emily-centered cult. Join either team, you'll have a blast.
My Youtube channel --> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCa8Nt7 ... ILthNNlUww
Feminism is cray.
FREEDOM!!!
Music FB page: https://www.facebook.com/louismusicdefinitelyofficial/
My Youtube channel --> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCa8Nt7 ... ILthNNlUww
Feminism is cray.
FREEDOM!!!
Music FB page: https://www.facebook.com/louismusicdefinitelyofficial/
- Bethany Shepard
- Moose Tracks
- Posts: 3907
- Joined: November 2012
- Location: I'm A Leo, So Everywhere At Once
Agree to disagree... 
I GREATLY despise Grady and ESPECIALLY Mandy! I'm sure there's more.

I GREATLY despise Grady and ESPECIALLY Mandy! I'm sure there's more.

"I am not a demon. I am a lizard, a shark, a heat-seeking panther.
I want to be Bob Denver on acid playing the accordion."
-Nicolas Cage
I want to be Bob Denver on acid playing the accordion."
-Nicolas Cage
-
- Mocha Jamocha
- Posts: 2595
- Joined: September 2012
- Location: A place I like to call "Home"
D= You person of hate!Bethany Shepard wrote:I GREATLY despise Grady and ESPECIALLY Mandy! I'm sure there's more.


^^ Props to Belle ^^
who are you asking, T.S.?T.S. (myself) wrote:I'm curious. Why do you think that?

LOTR IS AWESOME
Sage, I thought so highly of you...*shakes head*Sage wrote:KATRINA???? EMILY???? *shakes head* this is what happens when I go away...sad...truly...
Yes, Oliver, I was asking you why you hate Matthew so much.
"Happy Birthday to Hot Leaf Water Ess!" - Belle
- ArnoldtheRubberDucky
- Butter Pecan
- Posts: 2912
- Joined: June 2012
- Location: Unknown
- Contact:
I agree with you, Sammy, that we shouldn't hate characters just because they have quirks we don't like. Quirks are one of the things that make a character interesting. I disagree however, that we should never label any character as "the worst in AIO". Why shouldn't we do this? As fans, we should care about the show and its' characters, and that sometimes means railing against them. Believe it or not, that actually shows we care more about the show than if we were looking upon characters we hated with bored indifference. Love can sometimes be represented by dislike. We don't actually hate the show, we're just concerned about the tough time it's going through.
What's wrong with being a fair-weather fan of Odyssey? If I were listening to it during, say, the split-episode era, I wouldn't just say, "Well, I hate the new direction the show is going, but I'll still pretend I love it because Odyssey made good episodes a long time ago." I'm not going to remain a fan of newer material if the episodes are terrible. Odyssey is not really my "friend", and I'm not going to stick by bad episodes. I'll still keep up hope, though. Perhaps my argument is a bit negative, but for now, I'll stand by it.
What's wrong with being a fair-weather fan of Odyssey? If I were listening to it during, say, the split-episode era, I wouldn't just say, "Well, I hate the new direction the show is going, but I'll still pretend I love it because Odyssey made good episodes a long time ago." I'm not going to remain a fan of newer material if the episodes are terrible. Odyssey is not really my "friend", and I'm not going to stick by bad episodes. I'll still keep up hope, though. Perhaps my argument is a bit negative, but for now, I'll stand by it.
Sir Arnold, Knight of the Order of Augustine, Debate Vampire
Mr. Yorp wrote:You don't need a degree to shovel manure.
oh well he's boring and really isn't much of a character, they really didn't need him. that's why I don't like him.T.S. (myself) wrote:Sage, I thought so highly of you...*shakes head*Sage wrote:KATRINA???? EMILY???? *shakes head* this is what happens when I go away...sad...truly...
Yes, Oliver, I was asking you why you hate Matthew so much.

LOTR IS AWESOME
- NateVONgreat
- Cookies & Creme
- Posts: 239
- Joined: August 2013
- Location: Gulf Of Oman, either that or Karkand
(in ugly voice) VALERIE SWANSON~~~~ ugghhh!! it gives me shivers down my back thinking of it........
poor nelson
poor nelson
Sandwiches are wonderful
Sandwiches are fine!
I like sandwiches, I eat them all the time!
*applauds*
You share my point of view!
Indeed. Poor, poor, Nelson.
You share my point of view!
Indeed. Poor, poor, Nelson.
"Happy Birthday to Hot Leaf Water Ess!" - Belle
- The Old Judge
- Mint Chocolate Chip
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: May 2012
- Contact:
You'd think someone that spoiled and obnoxious would be an only child. It's weird to think that Mr. and Mrs. Swanson would spoil one child to that extreme of an extent, and then have Nelson, who seems to be a shy, humble character. Somebody didn't read Dr. Dobson's child-rearing books... 

Do you think you know music? Guess the hints at the end of each of my posts in A Musical Journey. (The name's a link. You can click it.)
Haha. That's my main reason for disliking Valarie. She simply doesn't make any sense, at all.
"Happy Birthday to Hot Leaf Water Ess!" - Belle
-
- Coffee Biscotti
- Posts: 3349
- Joined: June 2012
- Location: Kidsboro
- Contact:
Valerie, whatever else she may be, is strong spirited. Whatever made her go bad, it would be hard for her parents to stop her.
Nate, do you mean that you don't like her (who does, really... it's not really expected of us.) Or that you think she's a poor villain?
Nate, do you mean that you don't like her (who does, really... it's not really expected of us.) Or that you think she's a poor villain?
- "Pound Foolish, I just adoreee arguing with you! Here, have an eyeball."
~Suzy Lou Foolish
As the founder of the E.R.K., may I say: Emily RULES!
Esther and Ben from "Curious, Isn't It?" were the worst characters ever!
17:39<Novatom>: I'm in another boat. A boat of people who don't know what everyone's talking about. A boat that is sinking.
17:40<Sameriazx>: oh no... here we go again...
17:40<Sameriazx>: oh no... here we go again...
- NateVONgreat
- Cookies & Creme
- Posts: 239
- Joined: August 2013
- Location: Gulf Of Oman, either that or Karkand
ummmm, Both.
As a bad character meaning, the worst portrayed character, Jimmy,
JK I don't have any specifics, but most would be from the older generation of AIO, or really newer ones. It's just that the focus on the family people are just so good at finding talent!
As a bad character meaning, the worst portrayed character, Jimmy,
JK I don't have any specifics, but most would be from the older generation of AIO, or really newer ones. It's just that the focus on the family people are just so good at finding talent!
Sandwiches are wonderful
Sandwiches are fine!
I like sandwiches, I eat them all the time!
Mine is probably Emily I don't HATE her but she was to silly around Buck and she always thinks she right. Valerie's not to cool either.

Proud K.R.E Member
- HomeschoolCowgirl
- Peach Cobbler
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: December 2013
- Location: Odyssey USA!
Oh. Phillip Glossman. He's so sneaky and slimey... *shudder*

"Musical training is a more potent instrument than any other, for rhythm and harmony find their way into the inner places of the soul... making the soul of one who is rightly educated, graceful" -- Socrates
-
- Cookies & Creme
- Posts: 290
- Joined: January 2014
Emily does not stink.Whittifer wrote:Whatever. Emily stinks!
Girls just wanna have fun!