Until now.

What is our country coming to?
Thoughts? Discussions? Who you will vote for? Who you will not vote for?
Tbh, I'm wondering if people have been brainwashed..is it the return of Novacom? O_OBethany Shepard wrote:But, what's not to love about Donald Trump?! He's got the money, the fame and don't forget about the hair... love that hair.
And yet he just now endorsed Trump.Bethany Shepard wrote: I was really sad that Ben Carson didn't make it. I can see why, but he had the best ethics of all the candidates.
Same but oh well.Bethany Shepard wrote:OH. MY. LANTA. That's it. Novacom.
So... he loves him some China...
I was really sad that Ben Carson didn't make it. I can see why, but he had the best ethics of all the candidates.
Yes. I have now lost all my faith in his good judgement.Belle wrote:And yet he just now endorsed Trump.Bethany Shepard wrote: I was really sad that Ben Carson didn't make it. I can see why, but he had the best ethics of all the candidates.
Ben Carson endorsed Trump.
Why would you go for Trump?Blitz wrote:I'd go Rubio or Trump.
Ah, but did they clap? Bet they did.HomeschoolCowgirl wrote:Seriously: you're trying to get Evangelicals to like you and you're swearing in the same sentence?!?!?
Yes, his convictions aren't. But again, if he'll pass pro-life laws just to satisfy his party then sadly I hafta. I'm a single issue voter. If in decades past there was a guy who was a sociopath but was against slavery, and the other guy had great ideas on economics and so forth but still supported slavery, I'd have to vote for the anti slavery guy. Whether or not it was his actual conviction, so long as he'd pass anti slavery laws even to look good, that's what would have to come first. Don't vote for him in the primaries, of course! Anyone, anyone else. But ultimately, yeah. Blech.Eleventh Doctor wrote:Except Trump isn't pro-life but more to the point he is a sociopath who will say anything to get elected. I can't believe you are advocating voting for him.
Well one thing's good at least. We know finally who The Chairman is.Belle wrote:Why? Is it really Novacom? Is it the end of Western Civilization as we know it?
As Eleventh has said, can it really be said that a vote for Trump is a vote for pro-life policies? Why do you assume that he'll pass pro-life legislation? Is it his track record for honesty and integrity? You admit yourself that there is a possibility that Trump would do an about-face on that issue; if it's so important to you, why do you want to gamble with it like that?Pound Foolish wrote:But you have to vote for the guy who, even if it's just to preserve his reputation, will be pro life. You have to vote to protect the lives of babies, the most innocent among us.
You have options. You can just not vote for the President and then submit the rest of the ballot for other offices. You can do a write-in. And yes, you can vote third party. I'd rather give my vote to a shark than to an egotistical, bigoted, reckless, dishonest, selfish, spoiled, obnoxious brat who talks about how tough a negotiator he is and then in the same breath refuses to go to a debate because he can't negotiate with a news station over their choice of moderator. And frankly, when everyone thinks like this, that a third-party vote does not and cannot matter, then of course it won't.Pound Foolish wrote:Vote third party, ie, crumple up your vote and throw it to a shark?
My vote-that-isn't-actually-a-vote-because-I'm-not-18 lies with Rubio. He's been my favorite ever since Iowa, when I realized Carly Fiorina had no chance whatsoever. He definitely knows his stuff, which I definitely like to see in a candidate (Trump lacks this quality). He's very well-informed on the issues, and he has detailed plans to solve each one (Again, unlike Trump). Of course none of that would matter if I didn't agree with his positions. Luckily, I do.Bethany Shepard wrote:So, the now existing canadates are:
REPUBLICAN:
Ted Cruz
John Kasich
Marco Rubio
Donald Trump
DEMOCRATIC:
Hillary Clinton
Bernie Sanders
Not many good choices on either side.
My dad always said that if ever Marco Rubio ran, he would be ok. He just needed some maturing. I don't know, what do y'all think? If you had to pick out of this comical group, who would you pick?
There is a strong possibility Trump will have pro-choice legislation. There is a certainty Hillary will.TigerShadow wrote:Why do you assume that he'll pass pro-life legislation? Is it his track record for honesty and integrity? You admit yourself that there is a possibility that Trump would do an about-face on that issue; if it's so important to you, why do you want to gamble with it like that?
And what good will that do?TigerShadow wrote:You can just not vote for the President and then submit the rest of the ballot for other offices.
Oh? *looks it up* Oh, I could vote with someone who is even more certain not to win. Yay. Who exactly is gambling here?TigerShadow wrote: You can do a write-in.
Well that's admittedly interesting. Do you know of any policies that have or haven't been passed because of this?TigerShadow wrote:If more people didn't want a candidate in office than wanted him or her, then that administration knows to tread lightly and not rock the boat at the risk of inciting riotous fury. (Always assuming that Trump's handlers keep him on a short leash, which is not necessarily a guarantee.) That circumstance can also communicate powerfully in Congress; essentially, they know what they can and cannot get away with under that President.
Let's see.TigerShadow wrote:If you don't want to vote third-party, then that's fine, but don't discount it entirely as a possibility.