Legacy MAJOR SPOILERS FOR ALBUM 62 READ AT YOUR OWN RISK

Grab your AIO albums, and find a table! What makes your favorite episode the best? Have an episode you really dislike? This is the place to review and discuss AIO episodes and albums.

What do you give out of 5 stars to Legacy?

*****
0
No votes
****
3
23%
***
3
23%
**
3
23%
*
4
31%
 
Total votes: 13

User avatar
MonkeyDude
Cookies & Creme
Posts: 381
Joined: January 2017
Location: Africa (do do do do do do do)

Post

The actor for Tom (And Bart) has been dead for like 10(ish) years. I'm glad they finally addressed it instead of continuing pretending Tom didn't exist. I didn't really like this album a ton, It was interesting to see Jules and Buck again though.
*Finger guns aggressively*
User avatar
Autumnal
Chocolate Chip
Posts: 49
Joined: October 2016
Contact:

Post

Belle pretty much spoke my mind. These episodes have absolutely no structure. The second part is some of the worst, if not the worst Mood Whiplash the series has ever pulled. I usually don't mind it because it's so funny a lot of the time, but the first part had a clear tone: a bit melancholy and very nostalgic, something that suits it well enough because they're, in a way, saying goodbye to one of the eras of Odyssey. …Barring Buck and Jules who ruin the tone in their portions. This is a horrible send-off for a beloved character and I'm admittedly pretty miffed that the writers messed it up so badly. They should have made these two seperate episodes to focus on Tom's legacy and cut out Jules and Buck's sub-plots completely. I honestly can't believe that the writers wasted an entire episode named after Tom Riley's legacy just to show off one of their actors' singing.

I get what PennyBassett is saying, but there's a massive difference between cheering up the tone and just tossing the previous tone in the trash can and hitting you over the head with it to an obnoxious degree. There wasn't any gradual shift, either and that just made it way worse.
User avatar
Bob
Caramel Crunch
Posts: 117
Joined: October 2016
Location: The Metroplex
Contact:

Post

The comparison to Edwin isn't out of left field, but Edwin hasn't been on the show as a significant character in close to ten years. I seem to remember one post-50 episode even mentioning at some point that the Harlequin had been sold again. So, he seems to be pretty clearly out of the picture at this point, and saying that a new character is a "second Edwin" isn't on the mark. Karno Westcott's pretty clearly intended to fill a similar slot, like Jack Allen to Hal's Whit or Red Hollard to Bernard Walton, but there's no competition with an established character here. The 'job' has been vacant for a long time.

As far as covering Tom Riley goes... I think it goes without saying that in a perfect world, his passing would have been acknowledged years ago. The Odyssey team made a mistake by not addressing this sooner. But, I can understand why that might have been the case; Mr. Edmiston was a key player in the show and a good friend of the team for many years, and maybe it was too hard emotionally for them to cover it for quite a while. Writing about it then would have been like "Gone..." again, except Walker's character actually dies, while in '94 they left the door open for at least the possibility that Hal's character could come back or make a cameo.

When people address the subplots and especially the Western as "silly" or "forced", though, I think they miss a good part of what Walker and Tom Riley were about. While he was sometimes consumed with emotions brought on from the past, overall Tom very much lived in the moment. His character was upbeat, down to earth, not at all self-conscious, and liked to have a good time. Also, the actors and writers had worked with Walker for many years, and I'm sure they were inspired by their knowledge of him. We can conjecture from his time on the show and his portfolio elsewhere that he probably had a lot in common with his character. It's not unlikely that he liked Westerns and the kinds of skits that they did on AIO, especially in its earlier years ("Over the Airwaves" comes to mind), and they felt it would be appropriate to include something like that into a tribute. It seems that a good part of Walker Edmiston and Tom Riley's legacy was and is living and having fun doing it, which the characters and actors seemed to do in spades. So, what better tribute? I'm not sure that having an episode two-parter like "Life Expectancy" would have fit either the actor or the character's personality, and in any case it would be more than a little odd to try to do something in that style now, after not mentioning him at all since album 50.

As far as the plot and the pacing of the episode, I liked it overall. I won't deny that the circumstances that bring the troupe into play are a little contrived, but they aren't totally improbable, and this is not the first time AIO's ever required a little bit of suspension of disbelief here. Maybe the circumstances in the show were intended to parallel the real world; if so, all I can say is "Good for them". The writers, Will Ryan and co. took advantage of the opportunities and some apparent 'coincidences' God gave them and turned it into something that a lot more people could enjoy. The forest-set scenes were weaker than the others, but I don't think it's enough to wreck the entire show.

Legacy isn't a great two-parter, but it's better than people are likely to give it credit for and winds up the various plotlines reasonably well.

The skit is a significant part of the second episode, so I'll cover it a little bit. I liked it a lot overall. My main complaints are with the villain song, which is very reminiscent of the one from "Thankstaking", but isn't as clever, and that Buck's character gets out of death through what amounts to a cheap trick. It probably wouldn't have bothered me so much had I not been recently reminded of the Chronicles of Narnia, where Aslan literally dies in a way that is explicitly evocative of the Crucifixion. It made me think about Christ's sacrifice more, and that's what I was thinking about when Odyssey presented something else that was clearly meant to be inspired by that. But it seemed to present a cheapened version of it. "He gave himself up to die... but not really". I mean, 'Buck' doesn't even get hurt. It's also worth noting that he took action to resist the bad guys, instead of being "led like a lamb to the slaughter". That said, seeing as Buck's character was not supernatural, I admit I can't think of any other way he could have avoided an untimely demise otherwise.

Right now I'd give it 4 out of 5 stars.
A classic never goes out of style.
Tarol
Peach Cobbler
Posts: 1413
Joined: June 2015

Post

I only listened to the second part once, and I agree with the rest that it was pretty awful. The first part was mostly good though, I thought the crying scene with Connie and Eugene was very sweet, and gave is a little preview of the emotions they went through when Tom died, but we didn't have to go through a whole episode of it. It was super strange the Timothy Center wasn't mentioned once in the first episode, which really bothered me, as I thought that was the major portion of Tom's farm, not just the "farm" part. Honestly, unless his land was huge, I would assume the Timothy Center replaced much of his farm, as you wouldn't want so many tour groups and kids running through your fields/orchards, and from what I always picture the Timothy Center was only in the woods. But maybe my geography is skewed. It was cool to hear from Tom's sister after so many episodes. Buck and Jules did feel a bit odd, esp the "tension" in their relationship... but I've always been bothered by their friendship and development for some reason.

The second episode (from what I do remember) was not nearly as good, and the musical seemed very rushed in the episode.

In general, I think it was another "Something Old, Something New." First part was pretty good, the second part was awful.
xo eht haiasi-
User avatar
Shadow
Peach Cobbler
Posts: 1303
Joined: July 2016
Location: Tatsumi Port Island

Post

Actually, my opinion is that this was like `For Better Or For Worse' First part amazing, second part average.
Image
I'm Monty Whittaker's greatest fan. member of the K.R.E
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
User avatar
Connie G.
Peach Cobbler
Posts: 1491
Joined: August 2014
Location: odyssey.chat

Post

This episode was bothering to me. Yes, I knew Walker had died, and Tom was unlikely to come back. What I found troubling was that it came across to me like "Oh, hey, yeah, by the way, Tom died... like a long time ago... Sorry =p Yeah and it's like oooh, we're just FRIENDS and then oooh lets put Jules and buck in a forced mushy we-really-do-like-each-other dorky musical with her little singing friends OH I WONDER this may make JULES and BUCK realize they REALLY DO LOVE EACH OTHER and then we can create MORE DRAMA for Connie and everyone to FIX because that'll be INTERESTING! Ughh I tried y'all I tried to like this episode but I literally could not stand it. Sorry.
Image
Strength for today, and bright hope for tomorrow.

"Why does Connie shower all of the time?" ~CGM_Games
User avatar
MonkeyDude
Cookies & Creme
Posts: 381
Joined: January 2017
Location: Africa (do do do do do do do)

Post

Connie G. wrote:This episode was bothering to me. Yes, I knew Walker had died, and Tom was unlikely to come back. What I found troubling was that it came across to me like "Oh, hey, yeah, by the way, Tom died... like a long time ago... Sorry =p Yeah and it's like oooh, we're just FRIENDS and then oooh lets put Jules and buck in a forced mushy we-really-do-like-each-other dorky musical with her little singing friends OH I WONDER this may make JULES and BUCK realize they REALLY DO LOVE EACH OTHER and then we can create MORE DRAMA for Connie and everyone to FIX because that'll be INTERESTING! Ughh I tried y'all I tried to like this episode but I literally could not stand it. Sorry.
I really agree. We all knew Tom wasn't coming back, and Congrats to aio for finally facing the fire. But it was cliche and quite boring to be honest.
*Finger guns aggressively*
Post Reply