Blackgaard's Revenge -- A hit or miss?

Grab your AIO albums, and find a table! What makes your favorite episode the best? Have an episode you really dislike? This is the place to review and discuss AIO episodes and albums.

Did you enjoy Blackgaard's Revenge?

Hit! - It was awesome, and I think that everyone should lift it up on a pedestal for everyone plus your grandma to see.
7
26%
Mediocre - It's pretty good -- but I don't really think it's one of my favorites.
15
56%
Miss! - I hat---uh, strongly dislike, it! It's unrealistic and Dr. Blackgaard shouldn't have come back anyway, so...yeah. Don't like it.
5
19%
 
Total votes: 27

User avatar
Bob
Caramel Crunch
Posts: 162
Joined: October 2016
Location: The Metroplex
Contact:

Post

Listening to it again some time back, I think it's a two-parter driven mainly by Earl Boen's acting ability. If it was any other villain it would have been a disaster, but with Blackgaard it becomes surprisingly compelling at parts.

The writing for the good guys and their acting are all relatively weak this episode, although I thought Paul Herlinger did a pretty good job in the climax.

There are a lot of cheesy things and weaknesses in the plot (the big one being, as someone pointed out in a post years back, that the analogy they're driving at falls flat because Whit didn't personally sacrifice anything), but one other part where I think they drop the ball at the end is when Connie asks something like "Is Blackgaard truly dead now". I think Whit commented on this earlier in the episode, but it was forgotten by the end: the real Dr. Blackgaard died years ago, at the time this episode is portraying. The virus might have something like his personality or memories but his soul is long gone.

That said, whenever Earl Boen is "on screen", the episode magically becomes interesting. I remember being appropriately scared when I was a kid listening to the Civil War scene at the beginning, and I think he did a good job in the climax as well.

Some people look at it as a lowlight in Odyssey history. They have some good points, but I'd urge them to look at the bright side -- they could have brought Blackgaard back to life and made DBD completely pointless. Instead of that, we got this. It's a very flawed two-parter but I think it's enjoyable if you make the effort.
A classic never goes out of style.
User avatar
Kungfunaomi
Cookies & Creme
Posts: 282
Joined: May 2017
Location: CONFIDENTIAL

Post

*Barfs*
I only listen to it to hear Earl Boen. Everything else was awful, in my opinion. The premise, especially.
User avatar
Conniekendall fan
Strawberry
Posts: 58
Joined: February 2018
Location: Stuck inside a bucket.
Contact:

Post

yeah i agree it wasn't the best even though i voted hit.
Constance Kendall
User avatar
Shadow
Peach Cobbler
Posts: 1324
Joined: July 2016
Location: Tatsumi Port Island

Post

To be honest, I think my opinion on this episode has gone down with time - I use to think it was mediocre, but now, it just feels worthless. It's an episode that makes Blackgaard's end goal in Darkness Before Dawn make no sense. Why would Blackgaard try to possess someone with the Imagination Station when he was going to blow Whit's End to the ground? Hell, why did this virus not activate at any time before this convinent episode? Why is Aubrey the character here? What the heck is the Vortex of Time? Why does this episode exist and have Aubrey want to go to the crucifixtion when she's not a believer and doesn't become one until The Big Deal? Why do you seemingly have this episode as a part of Aubrey's journey to salvation when ultimately it offers nothing to said journey and can be taken out of her journey with barely any changes?
Blackgaard is well acted, but he can't carry a broken episode. Especially with his non-sensical plan and the entire episode making barely any sense. And on top of the terrible writing, the acting for everyone not named Blackgaard is hilariously awful, which only serves to make a broken episode worse. Yes, the sound design is good, but it's Odyssey, that's. . .kinda expected. As well, you have an entire episode about Blackgaard's final conflict. .and don't put in Jack Allen, the person who confronted Blackgaard in his last moments and who had a intruiging dynamic with him. That just doesn't add up to me. Or even Tom doesn't show up here, which also doesn't make much sense considering his connection to the Blackgaard Saga.

0.5/5. Terrible episode that has no reason to exist and is a stain upon the Blackgaard's Saga's conclusion.
Image
I'm Monty Whittaker's greatest fan. member of the K.R.E
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
djchatswithu
Cookies & Creme
Posts: 213
Joined: December 2018

Post

I believe that there are no bad ideas, it's just the way they're developed. The idea of Blackguaard having some kind of contingency plan does make sense for his character, and using the imagination station wasn't necessarily a bad plot idea. Here's a possible explanation of how this might have come about. I can't recall the odyssey team officially saying 'Dr Blackguaard is officially dead', so maybe he survived and somehow took some computer courses, (which is why it happen so long after the final conflict) hacked into the system and inplanted the virus. I don't believe this is true of course, but it would sort of make some sense, after all, if he did barely survive the explosion, he probably wasn't in the best state of mind.
User avatar
Shadow
Peach Cobbler
Posts: 1324
Joined: July 2016
Location: Tatsumi Port Island

Post

I mean, it still ruins the ending of The Final Conflict because it ruins the effect of Blackgaard's death in that episode, and the emotional pathos that we get from it.
Image
I'm Monty Whittaker's greatest fan. member of the K.R.E
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Post Reply