Is it bad that I have stronger opinions about whom Connie
shouldn't marry than whom she should?
I'm really glad Maureen exists. If Connie and Mitch ever got back together, I'd have considered changing my name and moving to Mars. I've felt better chemistry between me and a jar of Tostitos cheese dip. There is little that I find more gag-inducing than Connie swooning like "You
rescued me!" in "Exit", except maybe the sheer fact that the only Christian female protagonist of the saga got damselled in the final act. And their personal priorities were so wildly different. I keep seeing people whine and complain that Mitch was "selfish" and "rude" and "uncaring" for not wanting to give up his career to marry Connie, as if that makes him a bad person, but like...is it so unrealistic and awful that two people are led by God in different directions and they don't get married? They were incompatible for each other, they were nauseating to hear together, and I'm so glad the ship was permanently excised from the show.
Ameraka wrote:I like that they're not similar in temperament but they have enough commonalities for a relationship to work.
To be honest, they're really much more similar to each other than I think is healthy for a stable relationship. They're both detrimentally stubborn and hotheaded, they both leap before they look, and their first reaction to something is usually to try to fight it. There's very little balance there. Yes, they're both well-rounded characters who are more than just a checklist of similar negative traits, but for either of them to get married, their spouses have to be people who can temper them and get them to look at the bigger picture.
Ameraka wrote:They like each other already--is it so hard a leap for them to come to love each other?
Yeah, pretty much, for a variety of reasons.
Jason and Connie met when he was a retired NSA agent in his thirties (most likely, because he's still the youngest of three and yet he's also racked up a laundry list of skills, experiences, and connections that you just don't get without years of working in your field) and she was a high schooler—a
minor. As I wrote in my tumblr post on the subject, I really don't see any version of events where they come out thinking of each other in anything but a platonic way.
They're also at two completely different stages of life, and I don't think they can meet each other's emotional needs the way both of them deserve to have those needs met. Jason needs someone who can help him cope with the stress and trauma of his life, and Connie is simply not prepared to deal with that, a fact that was proven to us in "Something Blue". Sure, Connie's needs are a bit more on Jason's level than Jason's are for Connie, but she has another need that she spells out to both Mitch and the audience in "Plan B, Part II: Collision Course": "I'm an upfront person, and if I can't be honest with someone and they can't be honest with me, I don't see the point." Connie needs reciprocity and the feeling that she's on equal footing in a relationship, and Jason cannot meet that need for her because the huge gap of experiences and traumas between them would naturally make it very difficult for her to relate to him. In other words, Connie cannot be expected to play therapist for someone who is more likely than not dealing with post-traumatic stress. It's not healthy and it's not fair to either of them.
Plus, having a crush on somebody does not potential for a grand romance make.
To be honest, I'm kind of tired of hearing about Connie's love life. I get why fans are so invested in it, and I hope she does get married at some point, but I also hope it's to someone we haven't met yet and who is actually developed as a character outside of being her love interest. I'd really prefer we not have another Mitch, if at all possible.