Page 1 of 1
The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:11 pm
by Aaron Wiley
I was reading in the new official guide that one of the original ideas for album 51 was to set it about 5 years after album 50. This idea would help explain the drastic change of cast and characters and Whit's voice change. The idea involved a few cool things like a new job for Connie, kids for Eugene and Katrina and a few other major changes. in the end, the idea was rejected because the writers thought it might be too big of a change for the fans, and that they'd complain.
I personally think this could have been a really interesting idea had they decided to actually go through with it, but I do wonder if fans would be complaining more about the change because of 5 years of time passing between albums, or the drastic change of characters and actors when no time passed at all (like they did when album 51 was released)
What do you think? Should they have taken the leap of faith and tried this idea? Do you think it was a good decision to do what they did and try to make the changes a bit more "minor"?
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:14 pm
by GabrielleFandomGirl
They should have done it!
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:57 pm
by Pound Foolish
A new job for Connie... doing what? Doing Nathan Hoobler's toe nails? I mean, what else could she possibly be doing? Anyhow, more seriously, while I am so used to Connie's job and it and her have become so synonymous in my mind that separating her from her job seems like tearing her in two, limb from limb, it seems like a neat idea. After all, she seems to have stopped growing rather short of her full development potential, and she has always dreamed of being a teacher. Maybe it's AIO realized its own character's life-plans.
Anyhow, trust me, fans would have complained. I mean, they complained a ton about the smaller-ish changes, even. Plus, it would just be too much for AIO production to into non-existence for five whole years.
Oh well, it sounds like it would have been great in some ways... I don't know. If it wasn't for the five years thing, I guess I'd say they should've gone for it. On the other hand, fans of things are always wondering "what if things could have been different...?"
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:14 pm
by Nelson S.
I think it might have be a good change. I mean a lot of people would just hate the idea.
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:20 pm
by Kaida
Part of me thinks that it would've been a good idea and really interesting. But the other part of me would've been "What in the world happened in those 5 years? What did I miss? Explain please!"
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:57 pm
by Doll
I think that it would have been and interesting idea, especially since time seems to pass so slowly in regular Odyssey time.
It is an interesting concept and I wish that they had tried it.
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:45 am
by Ben Warren
There were so many changes made around that time that it really was too much to handle for many. The 5 year gap would have simply helped to explain those changes. I mean, Paul Herlinger had a good, logical excuse for why Whit's voice sounded different, why couldn't Stojka? It would have also explained large disappearances in characters (Bart, Tom, Bernard). It might seem jarring, but it's actually more jarring not having a reasonable explanation for changes.
That said, I would prefer to see the show make those change naturally without the need of a gap. Why can't Connie getting a job and Eugene having kids just be normal plot points?
Odyssey worked out, though, despite not making that big change. I like the show now.
Ben
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:00 am
by Suzy Lou Foolish
Like some of the others, I waver between whether I would have liked the idea or not. While it may be interesting to see what it would be like with a large gap and some quite major changes, I'm still rather grateful they decided to push away that idea...and like Ben W. said, it still worked out, even though they went against that plan. But goodness, Connie with a new job? Of course, I readily thought "how ridiculous". I can hardly imagine her not working a Whits End, and the thought is rather saddening. I suppose she must move on sometime, though. Poor Connie, we shall be forever deeming her to remain in the same position of the past twenty years.
Now, on the other hand--Eugene with a kid? That might be fun to see! I wonder if the child will be destroying bathtubs and attending Campbell County Community college by the age of 13?
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:51 pm
by Liz'alike
That is a very interesting idea... I don't know if I would have liked it or not
I think it would have made a lot of interesting stories. But, overall I think I would have been sad to miss out on so much in AIO's life. Though, maybe Connie could be married to Jason in a 5 year span (or at least be engaged! lol).
If they had done it, I would have rolled with the punch, but I don't think I would pick it.
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:46 pm
by ArnoldtheRubberDucky
I personally think they should have done it. It would have solved a lot of problems, and if anyone complained, I have to say in a less than sensitive manner that that's their problem. I don't know why anyone would complain, anymore than I know why parents complained about other episodes. I think it would be an intriguing idea that could be done well, so I'm all for it. But I guess it's too late now...

And as a side note, I can't wait to read the new Official Guide!

Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 1:44 am
by Kaida
I just got mine recently!

I'm letting my brother read it first though cause he asked.. I'll read it after him..
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:52 pm
by whittaker96
That would have been a great way to explain the new changes - and multiple television shows have used that technique to "go in a new direction for the show" - which was what Odyssey did. Oh well.
Is it worth getting the new Guide if I already have the 2008 edition? How much new stuff is there?
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:56 pm
by Kaida
I don't know.. I haven't read it yet. I won it though.. I didn't buy it.
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:05 am
by Suzy Lou Foolish
Be sure to let us know what you think of it when you do, Kaids. I'd like to get it as well, if it is good. (Which I could hardly imagine it not.)
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:20 am
by Nelson S.
I really want it! But I don't want to spend my money on it. Haha!
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:49 pm
by Samantha14
Nelson S. wrote:I really want it! But I don't want to spend my money on it. Haha!
Three words for you...
Make a trade
"I work for guide"

Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:49 pm
by GabrielleFandomGirl
I think it coulda been interesting, but I like to way it is now!
Re: The "Skip a few years" idea
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:59 pm
by Bethany Shepard
All I have to say is "change can help you change and that can be a good thing".
